Ratio
society and medical science to swaddling for decades remained
more or less stable.
-
Do I have to swaddle?
-
Not!
-
And how to swaddle?
-
Align handles, align the legs, and everything else to twist and bendmoretightly
and fix, so as not twitching.
-
And why tighter?
-
To legs were rovnenkie, to know who's boss ...
Gradually
attitudes have changed. Numerous studies have found absolutely amazing
a fact - it turns out, the curve becomes a straight leg from the tight wrapping.
It turns out that evenness feet generally to the technique of swaddling has nothing to do.
It turns out that tight zapelenatomu dityu harder to breathe. Moreover, the wise doctor
came to the conclusion that we should not force the baby! For if all children, without exception,
tend to occupy a certain position (pull your legs and bend the handle), it seems,
precisely this position is for a child the most physiologic, ie, convenient and
natural.
And
on the basis of so simple and so logical inference, tight swaddling has been subjected to
merciless criticism and fell into oblivion under the pressure of progressive medical and parental
public. In place of swaddling taut, it's swaddling free - as
symbol of democracy and respect for human rights.
child
zapelenaty freely, has the ability to move limbs and to take position
convenient for him. It would seem to be a consensus. Free diapering
- Best, convenient, traditionally meets the needs of both children and parents.
Yes, some grandmothers is not satisfied with swaddling, mainly for reasons
aesthetic. Well, is it possible to compare the amazing beauty, elegant, correct
and rovnenky cushion (resulting in a tight swaddling), and sloppy, jerk,
saccular formation, created by free swaddling?
But
with grandmothers can arrange. No, in the end, the man who can not be
persuade by reasoning about freedom and rights.
And
all would have been fine, but suddenly ... Suddenly, in dozens of countries, hundreds of media
information, there have been numerous reports that swaddling, it turns out
in principle, very bad. And even free diapering - it is not no freedom,
but only the freedom to mix in a confined space (the analogy with the freedom
move around within the prison). Moreover, there were thousands of special professional
- Child psychologists, the argument that, swaddling clothes of children, we
turns out to limit the perception of the birth of the world, break formation
tactile function, interfering with the harmonious development of human personality,
slowing down the individuality and in general - education of the person worthy of living in the 21
century, and the use of diapers - the notion of incompatible.
Millions
parental pairs in dismay and confusion. Poor our children ... We, the criminal
parental ignorance, they will have passed through hell flour diapers, now
retarded, inharmonious, underdeveloped, lack of initiative. And these, Crafty,
that the baby's loose jacket with sliders and of birth, will now be our command and
lord it over them in every way.
But
What to do? How do I fix it? It is clear that the next birth and infancy to forget
- A wise decision, but after all this, the backward-harmonious, sorry.
Say
in tasth, who really sorry - so it's poor parents. One gets the impression
that the parental instinct is able to provide the overwhelming influence on the elementary
common sense.
Notice
Note:
-
opponents swaddling met before. Typical, and perhaps the most famous
antipelenochnoy apologist propaganda - the great writer Leo Tolstoy. Paradoxically,
but most of Tolstoy, swaddled in the childhood, that on the one hand, did not prevent
him to show his own genius, on the other, prevented all the same, clearly
prove communication infantilism and lethargy Pierre Bezukhov with tight swaddling infant;
-
flourishing of human civilization and new technologies - from disposable diapers
to space flight - provided the people of swaddled child;
-
everyone who is reading these lines, swaddled in the childhood;
-
most paradoxical: - great child psychologists, threatening imminent calamity
all zapelenatym - swaddled in the childhood, too. Perhaps some tighter than necessary ...
Formation
full and harmonious development of human personality is actually determined
many factors: individual, genetically determined characteristics of
temperament and overall health in general and treatment of specific diseases
In particular, a system of educational and religious upbringing, a country habitat.
Special and, perhaps most important role is played by the psychological climate in the family,
formed a value system based on the number of children having both parents
and their contacts with each other, with children, with their own parents. All of the above
factors are very important and their influence on the child proved unconditionally.
At the same time, there is no full-fledged, tasly scientific research,
prove the connection of swaddling and the problems of personality development.
Thus
scientific and logical motivation out of swaddling does not exist, and on this basis
can be formulated main asle : swaddle or not to swaddle the baby
- Private affair of his parents, determined by their desires, abilities, as
life .
In
antipelenochnoy propaganda, at least in our country, clearly seen
economic motives. Any domestic factory, every shop, every housewife
can during the day to set up production of diapers. But nice pants, undershirts,
sliders suit, unitard - colorful, with pictures, lace,
zavyazochkami-tesemochkami, buttons and pockets - it ismoredifficult. It's expensive
overseas goods. And it's worth a raspashonochka like 5 diapers. Is not this the essence of
diaper hazard?
Parents
however, should be aware that rejection of the diaper is convenient
in many respects. We mention some of them:
-
When using raspashonok and sliders to the dressing of the baby can draw
men, because his father, who has mastered the art of swaddling - a unique phenomenon.
-
Diapers are very uncomfortable in the hot season - to overheat the baby is not difficult.
-
When washing, undershirts and sliders, as compared to diapers require less
amount of water and detergent, and drying not only take up less space
but dries faster.
-
How would free you do not swaddle a child, he may still be uncomfortable.
Again, regardless of the quality of swaddling, active child may well
and get unwrapped, well, if the room is warm. It is clear that self-rid
of the slider-raspashonok - many timesmoredifficult.
-
Undershirts and sliders really no way limit the motor
Activity ...
But!
All of the above - does not matter. And if the eldest child of the house remained
two dozen diapers, it is not necessarily spent on undershirts only because
that in the interval between pregnancies did you meet with the achievements of advanced
psychological thought.
repeat:
- It's your personal business, swaddle, swaddle or not. No one - neither the girl-consultant
in children's clothing store, no doctor, no psychologist, no one - does not decide for
you. Just do not think that this decision and in fact can seriously affect
on the health of your child. Want - shroud, do not want to - do not shroud. Only
do not be nervous.