Often there are cases that this happens to men too. Let's face it: some men feel the burden of even one wife, not knowing where did he do with it and how to get rid of it. On the other hand, modern men are not good Samaritans carrying out his long life in the endless search of helpless and unfortunate of God's creatures. To provide one spouse: to give her money for clothes, perfumes, food shopping, hair salons, expensive doctors, consultants and so on seems to most men a difficult undertaking. Meanwhile, talks about polygamy today acquired such importance that the issue of amending the Family Code of the Russian Federation regarding the possibility of polygamous marriages shall be submitted to the Duma debate and analyze the leading politicians and sociologists. Unwittingly seems like that do not live in a European country with a glorious past, but in some incomprehensible East Asian, dark medieval times with the wild steppe future. Empty balabolstvo our parliamentarians do not know borders. Following the initiative to revive the notorious Chechen leader-controlled territory and allegiance tradition of polygamy, some of Moscow's Duma members were quick to admire this position and to give due respect to the courage of viceroy of the Chechen monarchy. We need to polygamy. As air, water, money and vodka. So, on the agenda of polygamy. The most important argument to justify polygamy was and is the special situation of men compared with women. A man and a wiser andmorebeautiful, and aging women is much slower. Then why, in fact, did not allow him to have (in the sense of ownership and possession) several wives at once. At the level of Deputies is even reasonable. Well as for said onemorepoint. Remember a pop ditty: because the ten girls on Statistics nine guys? So it is. Guys really Statistics is even smaller. In addition, half of these guys are blue. And they all Russian women are now under the existing principle of monogamy, of course, will not suffice. But if a man would take him five or six girls, the problem resolved by itself. "Reasonable" reasons and arguments to this end. Still learning our glorious deputies are not infinite. Now consider the issue from a scientific, historical perspective, referring to the same book of Engels' Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State: Let's say a few words about polygamy and polyandry. Both of these forms of marriage can only be exceptions - so to speak, historical items and luxury goods - not counting unless the simultaneous existence of both of them in any country, which, as we know, does not happen. Since, therefore, find themselves outside of polygamy, men could not find the treats women made redundant as a result of polyandry, and the number of men and women: regardless of the social institutions that has hitherto been almost the same, neither one nor the other form of marriage itself could not be accepted. In fact, polygamy was one man, apparently the result of slavery and was only available to persons engaged in a unique position. In the Semitic patriarchal family type in polygamy has only one patriarch and, at most, a few of his sons, the others must be content with one wife. Such is the case even now in the East; polygamy - a privilege of the rich and noble, and carried out mainly through the purchase of slaves, the mass of the people living in monogamy. It always has been. That is to say, law of polygamy. Let's solve slavery. And why not. Slavery in the fucking Russian farming already exists. There is even an appropriate price. It remains only to legitimize the sale of slaves through the official media and auctions. But if you allow polygamy, then what about the principle of equality. That's right - and allow polyandry: An exception is the polyandry of India and Tibet, without interest, without a doubt, the question of its origin from a group marriage to be still further study. However, in the practice of polyandry, apparently, differs muchmoretolerant than jealous mode Mohammedan harems. So at least in Naira in India, although every three, four ormoremen have one common wife, but each of them may well have this in conjunction with the other three men and a second wife, as well as third, fourth, and so etc. But this raises another question: Is the Russian gene pool survive after such a transformation, if such debauchery and incest chernushnoe come into fashion and gain legal authority. It seems that the state and country to live in such a case, thirty or forty years, and sometimes less.