pparaturoy,
should answer the questions of researchers - one at the fair, on the other -
vice versa. At a time when the subject decides to lie (even before the
as false fly off with the mouth), an instant, lasting
milliseconds, the acceleration of blood flow, a sort of "surge". These shocks
sensors are recorded and displayed on a computer screen.



In the future, says Mr. Chance, the need for a sling with sensors no longer
at all. It would be enough just to touch the person special
sensitive detector to make sure of his sincerity. And the personal and
not even notice. Tase, such a test on a hidden tasth emerge
the ethical properties associated with the violation of individual rights at the
deeper level, what you can imagine, but such questions are usually
Progress is not a hindrance.



Traditional lie detectors (so-called polygraphs) are
devices that measure heart rate and respiration at a time when a person
responds to questions put to him. Fool him easily - enough
for example, simply press down on the nail in the shoe. Extreme unreliability
polygraphs successfully proved the Aldrich Ames - a senior U.S. Central Intelligence Agency,
successfully passed a polygraph test in the intervals between the spy
favor of the USSR and Russia, which he worked at his desk. And although
Federal agencies continue to test on a polygraph its employees, the courts
in the United States did not consider the results of polygraph tests as evidence.
Nevertheless, the development of scientists suggest that the development
muchmorereliable (though not one hundred percent) of the polygraph becomes
possible in the near future.



While Mr. Chance improves its worn on the head of the detector, another scientist
of Pennsylvania psychologist Daniel Langleben (Daniel Langleben) puts
volunteers into the MRI and photographs of their brain
yet they are telling lies. In this case, as claimed by the scientist, the individual plots
brain on the screen flashes brightly.



According to both scientists monitor brain activity will create
almost infallible polygraph, because people are not able to control
processes in their own brain. At the same time, the polygraph, for example,
registers not so much the fact of lying, as the accompanying fear of being
caught in a lie, and with symptoms of fear a person can handle.




In this case, the developers stress that "light" side of a reliable
the lie detector is usually underestimated. For example, what better way to emphasize
innocence of the innocent, than a negative test result
tasly reliable polygraph?



But that's not all. Doctors will be able to verify how accurately the patient describes
own symptoms. Enterprise management will be able to test the sincerity of
own employees. And employees - honesty, managers and accountants.



One of the methods of detection of lies has been tested in practice.



The device, developed by Lawrence Favell (Lawrence Farwell), the company Brain Wave
Science, allows us to obtain "fingerprints of the brain, as unique as the
fingerprints. To obtain them using the radiation of the brain in the wake of the P300,
which is emitted when a person is considering a familiar object. On
device has been tested by a court charged with the murder of Terri Iowa
Harrington (Terry Harrington). Test results showed that, in his
Memory is not a scene of murder. The court, however, did not accept the test results in
as evidence.

Source: News.Battery.Ru